Introduction to Business Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Introduction to Business Law - Essay instanceIn matters concerning contribute and acceptation, communication is of par number importance. In the given case, Eddie telephoned Adele on Monday to ask for quote for the pitch shot of 12 wild boar piglets to the Eagle Pub. This is non an offer. It is a mere inquiry and it does not amount to an offer. Adele in create Eddie that the piglets would comprise ?1,100 each and would be delivered on Thursday morning at a cost of ?150. This is again just a piece of information and not an offer. Eddie was satisfied with the price but treasured the lurch to be made on Wednesday. From the facts, the conduct of Eddie is such that it sack be construed that this was an offer. Adele promised to give an dish up on the next morning via fax. She sent a fax next morning confirming that the delivery was possible on Wednesday and it would cost ?13,350 in total. According to the given facts, Eddie was not in his office on Tuesday morning. If the courts are convinced that the aforementioned offer by Eddie was a valid offer, his absence from his office on Tuesday morning would be immaterial. A question can be raised whether Adeles faxs communication to Jane was enough. It would also be immaterial. It is because of the establishment of Postal Rule. In Adams v Lindsell 1818 EWHC KB J59, the suspects offered the plaintiffs by a letter to sell some fleeces of wool and asked them to answer via post. The plaintiffs received the letter posthumous referable to misdirection but posted their toleration right away. Before their acceptance could reach the defendants, the defendants contracted with some other party to sell the wool. Almost a similar scenario was encountered in Henthorn v Fraser 1892 2 Ch 27. The courts, therefore, specified a definite time of acceptance via post. The acceptance of an offer would be deemed to have been made when the letter of acceptance is posted and is out of the power of the offeree. This rule can also be stretched to communications with fax. Adeles acceptance was made when she sent the fax to Eddies office. It does not matter whether Eddie saw the fax or not. Since the offer was accepted, the object was legal, both parties had consideration and there was an intention to create legal relations, a contract had formed and was legally binding on both the parties. It had formed at the time when the acceptance was made. Eddie is wrong in his thinking that he owes nothing to Adele. His contract with Peter is a breach of contract with Adele. He can be sued for damages by Adele for his breach of contract. The damages would amount to a sum that puts Adele in such a financial position in which she would have been if there was no breach by Eddie. However, Adele would not be able to recover the loss of ?400. It is because the loss was too remote. In Hadley v Baxendale 1854 9 Exch 341, the defendant contracted to take the plaintiffs mill shaft to London where it was to be used as a model to buil d a new one. Due to defendants fault, the shaft was returned late and it caused the plaintiff to lose profits. The plaintiff sued to recover damages for loss of profits. It was held that the loss caused was too remote and it could not have been recovered. Therefore, by the application of above case, Eddie would not have to compensate Adele for lost profits of ?400. act 2 In the given case, Adele went to Bambi Stores Ltd to purchase some animal feed. She was absolutely unalarmed and unwarned when she was hit by a fork-lift truck driven by