Philosophy of Judeo Christian Writings Essay

Explain how the intelligence portrays the creativity of perfection. (25 marks)When bear witness in sequence thither be many fightory statements surrounded by Genesis chapter one and two. The origins of the world and order of introduction are for fashion model several(predicate). Although within the same holy text, the two chapters provide contrasting theories on creation. numerous Christian beliefs are based around the caprice of creatio ex nihilo, creation from nothing. Yet the very premier lines of their ancient text contradict this. They imply that in fact divinity fudge was hovering over the waters forward beginning the creation of the priming. If water was already in earthly concern thence divinity did not take a shit from nothing. Some Christians believe this statement to be a metaphor to help us understand. The waters represent the undiscovered and unseen, the concept of complete nothingness is too difficult to understand so waters are introduced. Some point to the phrase the earth was formless to show that perhaps creatio ex nihilo is castigate. divinity fudge doesnt create the world yet moulds it into a more recognisable form he budges from macrocosm a creator to being a designer. Many press this makes the concept of theology less impressive, for if idol is not the only gross(a) thing he is no longer unique. The earth is not Gods appraisal but more his interpretation. A potter mess only make so such(prenominal) with clay as God could only create so much from the chaos of the earth. This limitation means the world is not a creation of Gods but the best he could do with what he had.In Genesis 1 the order of creation is light, land, vegetation, day and night, creatures of the sea, birds, livestock, wild animals and fin exclusivelyy homophiles. Although human races were do in Gods image they are the final sum to Gods world. The phrasing of this produces confusion for God says, in our image, this suggests that there is a gr oup of Gods rather than one judgement over solely. This is often seen as Gods recognition of human presence becoming inevitable, so when he says, our he refers to him/herself and humanity. In chapter 2 of Genesis the order of creation is much polar. Rather than humans creation being the cherry on the top they are the very first creation from which all else is based. Also the verse says the Lord God make the earth which suggests creation ex nihilo rather than order from chaos. Equally different from the first chapter, God only creates man originally and women come much later. These contradictions are often the root word of many of the criticisms levelled at Genesis.The difference surrounded by God the creator and God the builder is very important and is the basis of all Christian belief. Although there is confusion within the text it is interpret as being a theory of creatio ex nihilo, separating God from all else in existence.Gods omniscience, omnipresence and omnipotence are c entral to his favourable position over humans. Yet if God is truly omniscient then why did he plant the tree of knowledge in the Garden of paradise from which Eve was tempted to eat the forbidden fruit. If God is omniscient he would bear known Eve would eat the fruit and therefore deliberately tempted her, if this is correct then it brings in the morality of God. If God knew all this then he deliberately caused Eve pain which would be an evil act, and thus God is not pure goodness, but flawed like the human race. secondly if God is omnipresence how can he take a physiologic presence and walk through the Garden of Eden and have a face to face conversation with Adam. As soon as God takes a physical form like when he breathes into Adams nostrils in chapter 2 he is less divine and less unique. God is worshipped because he isnt human, because he is separate and omnipotent, a potency that is beyond human understanding. If he isnt omniscient or ubiquitous does this make him less divin e?Differences within the genesis story face lift these questions and are the basis of doubt for many non believers.The creative God of the Bible is similar to Aristotles Prime mover Discuss.(10 marks)A creative God and Aristotles Prime mover are similar in a variety of ways. Both are separate and more powerful than anything of lay origins. They are both eternal and thus timeless. The very basic idea of a higher power is followed in both these examples. Yet there are huge differences between the two theories. The creative God of Judeo Christian beliefs is very much an active crackicipant of the world, he can blether to the bulk and act upon the requests of humanity. He has the ability to participate in tone and have a direct effect on life.This is very different to the Prime mover idea Aristotle believed that there is a higher being that is in its entirety passive to life. The prime mover is the original economical cause that began all the activity within the universe but from that action, has taken no further action. Aristotle believed that in order for his prime mover idea to work, the higher force must be infallible in all ways.He must have no potential for potential involves change which the PM can never do. The only effect that the PM has on the world is to attract the people of it, to him. They are attracted to his perfection, he takes no action, never intervenes and has no plan for it, and this is why he is perfect. He has no flaws because on a very basic level he never makes a decision that can be wrong. Morally he as well as is passive and so therefore can never be evil. Many argue that this inability or refusal to act make the PM an feeble idea, for he is not perfect but truly neutral. at heart the Judeo Christian religions the problem of Evil and suffering is often a reason not to believe or question the beliefs of others. This isnt an issue within the PM theory for, the PM never intervenes and therefore all evil is human made, yet equally so is all goodness within the world. Within the Judeo Christian religions it is equally the ability of God to do good that attracts people to believe as it is the recognition that evil and suffering is a part of life. God has an active role to play within humanities existence whereas the PM is simply an unmoved ideal that all people are attracted to.