Team Analysis

Analysis of Team A Learning squad ups give individuals an opportunity to work together to achieve a goal or appointment. Our instruction group members copd the charter to become long-familiar with individual strengths, areas they would the like to modify and skills they can offer to the aggroup while completing delegate tasks. The expectations we have to be successful are stated in the charter, along with methods to reign over conflict if it occurs.Evaluating the group members self-assessments along with their donation to the aggroup charter get out raise a basis to improve the performance of Learning Team A. Team Charter Becoming familiar with team members is the primary method to know the best way to manage the performance of a team. Completing the team charter provided the foundation for team members to express their thoughts and processes of an effective team. As a learning team we found some ground rules necessity of a team peaker, checking in with team frequen tly, expressing problems early on.Overall, the expectations appear to be similar among all team members supporting communication with team members, sharing equal responsibility for the assignments, requesting and accepting assistant when needed from other team members in order to complete an assignment on time. When these expectations are not met it could result in conflict. When conflict occurs, professionalism and a direct approach will work best to manage the touch we agree this will allow the team members to resolve the matter and put out with assignment. Self-assessments We shared our results from the self assessments on trust, listening and character types.The assessment on trust demonstrated how most of us have trust issues, extract Michael appears to be more trusting of others, within the group. This indicates the need for us to check into we communicate to our fellow team members our intentions and follow through, in order to strain trust among each other to maintain adequate performance. Listening skills were to a fault an assessment we performed individually most of us were surprised to see we were not as good listeners as we thought. The scores were in the mid 40s, indicating we will need to make a concerted effort to listen to team members when communicating.Although, we are communicating in a virtual forum, it is still alpha for us to be aware of our weaknesses as listeners so when communicating online we keep off potential setbacks in our team performance from miscommunication. As for the Jungian personality type assessment, all the team members felt that it closely depicted them. organism aware of individual attributes or strengths will help to enhance the teams performance by knowing what they can contribute. Larry is observant, cool, unpretentious and super motivated. Although, we have not delegated a leader yet, I would choose him to lead our team.His personality will compliment the other personalities within the team and and then facilitate the work that needs to be done. Michelle and Richard were assessed as problem solvers and extremely conceptual, I see them as the team members that can address the problems that force delay completion of an assignment. Possibly, Michelle and Richard can ensure the assignment is broken floor or develop a method to complete. Michael appears to have the personality that is out-going and a visionary. These skills compliment those of Michelle and Richard by providing innovative ideas, for instance, preparing presentations.My personality assessment represents a vivid and logical manner in which I deal with situations. This will provide the team some assurance I will keep team members informed of the assignments and progress of our team. Overall, I think we have a equilibrise group of personalities to ensure optimal performance as a team. expiry Learning team A will work together to complete assignments the team charter defines the methods we will use to improve performanc e. Relying on the strengths and skills of the team members will improve the efficiency of the team. As a team, we are individuals with unlike personalities, strengths and weaknesses