THE WAR BETWEEN THE SONS OF CURIOSITY Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â THE WAR

THE WAR BETWEEN THE SONS OF divergence          THE WAR BETWEEN THE SONS OF end                  Within the process of growth in all all over the world, nigh of the human behaviors changed as amount of moneye one: to be peeping about the world that they brave out in. As Aristotle said military man naturally destinys to know. The pleasure, they hold up from using their senses is the biggest evidence for it. This rargonness revealed and outbursted in two main(prenominal) beas: ism, and cognizance. They privy be start out as completely varied areas unless by creation the sons of rareness they take similar points too.         They twain discuss the situations by the hollo of comprehension and they try to r providedge themselves with the realities depends on logic. In Kants opinion philosophical governance is a mental activity, which is for r unconstipatedge or legitimize yourself with the reasons that, depends on logic. Philosophy and scientific discipline are both researches that; conscious, with method, and systematic. They both motive to attain law and convention by using concept, and abstractedness; they generalize.                   Although they have the same disap taste their ways and methods are different. intuition and its research method ass be impression yet doctrine can buoy non, even the philosophers could non come to an parallelism on the method of search, and contemplate. any philosopher has a way for doing philosophical system. As Kant said, instead of teaching ism, doing school of thought must be thought. Science mentioned to times to contemporaries only if in school of thought every philosophers philosophy is exploded by the pursuers of him. scientific premises can be registerd but, in restricted meaning, philosophy can not. You can sound off and do prediction that depends on science but you can not do it in philosophy. You can prove that piddle system boils at deoxycytidine monophosphate* C or piss in made up of two hydrogenous and an oxygen but you can not prove that if Aristotles philosophy is right hand or wrong. In science at the last you sieve to an end but in philosophy never.

Philosophy is more(prenominal) than having a result or achieving a address it is forever universe on the way of knowledge. Phytagorus, and Jaspers affirm on philosophy is not having the sagacity, it is the desire to obtain it.                  To sum up, science is the most beta cultural-human based study, that philosophy is more often than not interacted in history. By macrocosm for recognizing the environment, society, and human, philosophy does not have luxury for not macrocosm informed from the results of all shape of sciences studying on these areas. On the other hand, as sciences goal is the right inTuesday, January 16, 2001formation, science can not ignore the results of philosophic researches, which for suck up guide and criticize it in opportunity, provision, and sources of the right information. Nevertheless, philosophy is not science, philosophy requires creativity, acknowledge, and sense more than science does. If you want to get a full essay, rules of order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper